NEWS AND ISSUES
Testimony of NYS Senator Thomas K. Duane Regarding The Proposed Riverside-West End Historic District Extension I
March 22, 2011
My name is Thomas K. Duane and I represent New York State's 29th Senate District, in which most of the proposed Riverside-West End Historic District Extension I ("the Extension") is located. Thank you for the opportunity to present testimony before the New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission ("LPC") regarding this remarkable concentration of historic buildings.
First, I would like to express my appreciation to LPC for moving forward with the consideration of the Extension, which is generally bounded by West 79th Street and West 87th Street along portions of West End Avenue, Riverside Drive and Broadway, as well as for calendaring the Riverside-West End Historic District Extension II to the north and the West End-Collegiate Historic District I to the south. As you know, the Extension is a crucial part of this larger stretch of West End Avenue, from West 70th Street to West 109th Street, for which preservationists, community advocates and elected officials have long sought the protections afforded by historic district designation. A study of this area conducted by Andrew Dolkart, a leading architectural historian and Director of Columbia University's Historic Preservation Program, found that its buildings have unique architectural and historical merit.
The proposed historic district captures a relatively short but significant window of time in late 19th Century and early 20th Century architecture. During this period, economic and social forces – largely a result of the introduction of service on the revolutionary Interborough Rapid Transit Subway line beneath Broadway in 1904 – contributed to the redevelopment of West End Avenue and Riverside Drive from low-rise row houses amidst rural landscapes to an enduring chain of grand apartment buildings. Designed by prominent architects like George F. Pelham, Schwartz & Gross, and Clinton & Russell, these buildings are among the finest examples of New York Cityfs early 20th Century multifamily dwellings and form a cohesive and uniquely "New York" model for upper-middle class living. As Dolkart describes, the buildings on the avenues create a tremendous sense of place, with consistent height, cladding materials, and buildout to the lot line. Nestled between these are the Neo-Gothic St. Ignatius Protestant Episcopal Church and the stunning and unique Church of St. Paul & St. Andrew. Dolkart's findings make a compelling case for the Extensionfs designation.
Unfortunately, the voracious New York real estate market, if left unchecked, poses a serious threat to this cohesive span of historic architecture. Already, Neo-Renaissance row houses at 732 and 734 West End Avenue – located in the proposed Riverside-West End Historic District Extension II – have been demolished, and the sitefs owner has obtained a permit from the New York City Department of Buildings to construct a tall residential building there that likely will not conform to the areafs aesthetic character. This same owner has also sought permits to demolish row houses at 508 and 510 West End Avenue, which are located in the Extension under consideration today, although these permits have to date not been granted. These cases illustrate the risk of leaving critical portions of New Yorkfs architectural history unprotected. It is essential that LPC acts now and designates the Riverside-West End Historic District Extension I in its entirety.
Thank you for your consideration of my comments and your admirable commitment to preserving New York City's heritage. I look forward to submitting testimony again at LPCfs upcoming hearings on the Riverside-West End Historic District Extension II and the West End-Collegiate Historic District Extension.